Chaos or Leadership?, Antisemitism and Extremism in the West.

In some parts of the world, extremist organizations are treated with zero tolerance. Groups linked to radical ideologies don’t get the privilege of running “charities” or hiding behind social causes. Meanwhile, in the West, these same groups often operate openly, sometimes even gaining public trust. That double standard says a lot about how leadership defines security.

Take the issue of antisemitism. In the U.S., it’s often brushed off as a matter of free speech, reduced to just another “opinion.” But in other countries, it’s recognized as a crime — something dangerous that fractures societies and threatens peace. The question isn’t about silencing voices, but about protecting people from hate.

What’s the cost of pretending hate speech and extremism are harmless? Communities feel less safe, and the line between free expression and open hostility disappears. Once that line is blurred, it becomes harder to control what comes next — riots, divisions, and even violence.

Leadership is about drawing firm boundaries and having the courage to enforce them. Without that, the West risks sliding into chaos, where safety takes a backseat to political correctness. At some point, we have to decide: do we want leadership, or do we want endless excuses for the groups and voices that thrive on division